If employers are loath to have a specific figure in mind when it comes to making a salary offer to a prospective worker, fearing they may turn it down, business owners may want to reconsider, based on the results of a new survey.
Policyholders who are contemplating sticking with their employee benefits plan or taking advantage of the marketplaces provided by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will have new sources to turn to in order to better understand what the exchanges are all about.
For Minnesotans who aren’t covered through employee benefits provided by their workplace, consumers are being encouraged to look to the state’s insurance marketplace. And in order to persuade more Minnesotans to take notice, a $9 million ad campaign has recently been launched.
As New Jerseyans examine their employee benefit offering provided by their workplace, many of them may soon wind up losing their coverage and it appears as though the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may be to blame.
A new report indicates that depending on where consumer live in the U.S., they will see vastly different premium prices on their health insurance whenever the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act goes into motion.
In what appears to be becoming a theme, the government will postpone an additional provision of the Affordable Care Act that was originally scheduled to go fully into effect on January 1, 2014.
Now that the employee benefits provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has been postponed, some lawmakers want the state-based insurance exchanges to delay their launch times as well if consumers’ privacy is not protected.
While the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has yet to go into full effect, the parts that are in operation aren’t thought of highly by many Americans, according to the results of a recent poll.